The update after the MAY DAY

 Happy May Day everyone, this update is mainly to provide additional explanation for our last experiment, Jeff and I found that our last experiment lacked specific information, so we have searched the internet for three academic articles to provide additional explanation.

For First article, entitled "Incentives and Reward Systems" published on ResearchGate, discusses the relationship between incentives and reward systems in organizations. The authors review the literature on the subject and provide insights into the design and implementation of effective reward systems.

The authors place particular emphasis on the importance of motivation in driving employee performance and the role of reward systems in facilitating such motivation. The authors argue that reward systems can be a powerful tool for shaping employee behavior and promoting desired outcomes.

Various types of reward systems, including financial and non-financial rewards, are discussed, along with the advantages and disadvantages of each. The authors point out that financial rewards are often seen as the most effective, but they may not always be feasible or desirable. Non-financial rewards, such as recognition and feedback, can also be effective in motivating employees.

The authors also highlight the need to design reward systems that are aligned with organizational goals and values. The authors argue that a well-designed reward system should promote behavior that is consistent with organizational culture and values.

This article provides valuable insights into the design and implementation of effective reward systems and highlights the importance of motivation in driving employee performance. The authors suggest that organizations should carefully consider their reward systems and align them with their goals and values to achieve optimal results.

The links for the article is https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313993584_Motivation_and_Reward_Systems

The second article, entitled 'The Benefits and Challenges of Collaborative Multi-Agency Working', published in the journal Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, examines the social and health care services in The benefits and challenges of collaborative multi-agency working in social and health care services.

The authors of this article review the literature on collaborative multi-agency working and identify several benefits of this approach, including improved service delivery, better outcomes for service users, and increased efficiency and cost effectiveness. The article highlights that collaborative working can facilitate better communication and information sharing between agencies, which in turn can improve decision-making and service delivery.

The article also discusses the challenges of collaborative working, including issues related to communication, power dynamics and resource allocation. The authors note that effective collaboration requires a shared vision and clear communication, as well as a willingness to address power imbalances and overcome challenges through cooperation.

I found that the authors also emphasis the importance of leadership in facilitating effective collaborative working and state that leaders need to provide a clear vision, establish shared goals and create a culture of trust and respect. The authors argue that collaborative working requires a range of skills and competencies, including communication, negotiation and problem solving.

The links for the article is https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042814050009

The last article conclude many specific details that our experiment has shown last blog.  I have paste the content Picture below, If anyone interest in it the article links is https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0896627302009637.